Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 57
Filtrar
1.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 46(6): 102456, 2024 Apr 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38588946

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in 0.4%-0.7% of benign hysterectomies. Pelvic vascular compression secondary to fibroids may elevate VTE risk. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and timing of VTE among individuals undergoing hysterectomy for fibroids and other benign indications. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent a hysterectomy for fibroid and non-fibroid indications from January 2015 to December 2021. Main outcome measure was VTE consisting of pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis diagnosed during 3 periods: (1) preoperative (1 year before surgery until day before surgery), (2) early postoperative (surgery date through 6 weeks after surgery), and (3) late postoperative (6 weeks to 1 year after surgery). Demographics, comorbidities, surgical characteristics, and VTE rates were compared by indication. RESULTS: A total of 263 844 individuals with fibroids and 203 183 without were identified. In total, 1.1% experienced VTE. On multivariable regression (adjusted demographic confounders and route of surgery), the presence of fibroids was associated with increased odds of preoperative (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.12; 95% CI 1.03-1.22, P = 0.011) and reduced odds of late postoperative VTE (aOR 0.81; 95% CI 0.73-0.91, P < 0.001). For individuals with fibroids, uterine weight ≥250 g and undergoing laparotomy were independently associated with preoperative (aOR 1.29; 95% CI 1.09-1.52, P = 0.003 and aOR 2.32; 95% CI 2.10-2.56, P < 0.001) and early postoperative VTE (aOR 1.32; 95% CI 1.08-1.62, P = 0.006 and aOR 1.72; 95% CI 1.50-1.96, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with fibroids were at increased odds of having VTE 1 year before hysterectomy. For those with fibroids, elevated uterine weight and laparotomy were associated with greater risk of preoperative and early postoperative VTEs.

2.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 31(2): 71-83.e17, 2024 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37931893

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: No consensus currently exists regarding patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) instruments. This structured review was conducted to identify the PROMs used by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated surgical treatment in patients with endometriosis. DATA SOURCES: Two parallel searches were conducted by a medical librarian using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane Library for RCTs published from 2000 to July 2022. One search focused on studies reporting quality of life (QoL), and the second search focused on studies reporting pain and sexual, bowel, and bladder function. METHOD OF STUDY SELECTION: During the title and abstract screening and reference check, 600 results were identified on PROMs relating to QoL and 465 studies on PROMs relating to pain and sexual, bowel, and/or bladder function and an evaluation of 17 and 12 studies conducted, respectively. The inclusion criteria involved selecting RCTs that focused on surgical intervention and assessing QoL, pain, and sexual, bowel, and/or bladder function using PROMs. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Covidence software was used to organize and identify duplicate articles through screening. We developed a data extraction form to collect key information about each included study, as well as the pertinent PROMs used in the study. Assessment of the risk of bias of each study was also performed. A total of 19 studies were identified involving 2089 participants and a total of 16 PROMs used across the studies; 9 of 19 studies (47%) were rated as having a low risk of bias. There were no high-risk studies identified in this review. CONCLUSION: This study identified a large number of RCTs in surgical treatment of endometriosis that used various PROMs to assess QoL, pain, and bladder, bowel, and sexual function. The PROMs used by high-quality RCTs for QoL include Endometriosis Health Profile-30, Endometriosis Health Profile-5, Short-Form 36, Short-Form 12, and EQ-5D; for bowel-related symptoms Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom Questionnaire, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index, and Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence Severity Scoring System/Wexner; for bladder-related function Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, International Prostate Symptom Score, Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire, and Urinary Symptom Profile; and finally for sexual function Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire and Sexual Activity Questionnaire. Unlike other domains, only one tool (visual analog scale) was the dominant PROM used for the assessment of pain. In addition, the use of more than one PROM in each study to assess different aspects of patient's health and pain symptoms did not become prevalent until after 2015.


Assuntos
Endometriose , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Incontinência Urinária , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Endometriose/cirurgia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Dor , Qualidade de Vida , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente
3.
Fertil Steril ; 120(4): 920-921, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37487820

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To review important diagnostic considerations for accurate identification of a prolapsing submucosal myoma and to highlight surgical techniques for minimally invasive and uterine-sparing combined vaginal and hysteroscopic myomectomy. Submucosal myomas can present with various symptoms, including vaginal bleeding, pelvic pain, and abnormal discharge, and can also contribute to infertility. This type of myoma has the potential to prolapse through the cervical canal, and prompt identification and management are essential to avoid serious sequelae, including hemorrhage, infection, and sepsis. DESIGN: A case report. Patient consent was received to publish. This publication received an exemption from institutional review board approval from the institution as this was a case report. The investigators have no conflicts of interest. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: We present a 33-year-old G5P2032 patient with pelvic pain and vaginal bleeding. Her clinical course involved multiple encounters with inaccurate diagnoses, leading to worsening symptoms. She was found ultimately to have a large, prolapsing submucosal myoma. The patient included in this video gave consent for publication of the video and posting of the video online, including on social media, the journal website, scientific literature websites (such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and others), and other applicable sites. INTERVENTION(S): Given the severity of her symptoms and her desire for uterine preservation for future fertility, the patient was counseled on the need for surgical intervention and elected to proceed with a combined vaginal and hysteroscopic myomectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Preoperative considerations discussed in this video include common mimics of this condition, the importance of a thorough pelvic examination and preoperative imaging, as well as recommendations for surgical management. RESULT(S): We reviewed the following surgical techniques: (1) adequate exposure; (2) clamping of the myoma stalk; (3) morcellation "cone" technique; (4) use of intracervical vasopressin; (5) hysteroscopic evaluation; and (6) insertion of an intrauterine balloon. CONCLUSION(S): Prolapsing submucosal myomas can present as common gynecologic complaints but can lead to serious sequelae when timely diagnosis and treatment are not performed. Appropriate evaluation, accurate diagnosis, preoperative imaging, and knowledge of surgical techniques are critical for optimizing patient outcomes and avoiding complications in patients with a prolapsed myoma.


Assuntos
Leiomioma , Mioma , Miomectomia Uterina , Neoplasias Uterinas , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Gravidez , Leiomioma/diagnóstico , Leiomioma/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Uterinas/complicações , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia , Miomectomia Uterina/métodos , Hemorragia Uterina/cirurgia , Dor Pélvica , Histeroscopia/métodos
4.
Fertil Steril ; 119(4): 699-700, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36738775

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To present a multidisciplinary approach to localize and resect suspected interstitial ectopic pregnancies. Interstitial ectopic pregnancies are distinct from eccentric intracavitary pregnancies and are defined by ultrasound-based criteria, including an empty uterine cavity, gestational sac located >1 cm from the cavity, thin overlying myometrium <5 mm, and the interstitial line sign. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENT(S): Here, we present the case of a 28-year-old patient at 6 weeks of gestation by last menstrual period who presented to the emergency department with spotting. Initial pelvic ultrasound findings demonstrated a gestational sac and yolk sac that were believed to be located eccentrically within the uterine cavity. Follow-up imaging was performed 2 weeks later that revealed the pregnancy was located at the uterotubal junction and distinct from the endometrial cavity, consistent with an interstitial ectopic. The patient had ongoing light spotting with mild cramping, a benign clinical exam, and normal laboratory findings. Accurate assessment of pregnancy location is critical given that the mortality rate from interstitial pregnancies is twice that of other ectopics. In contrast, live birth rates for eccentric intracavitary pregnancies may be up to 69%, and some clinicians consider expectant management of asymptomatic patients in the first trimester. INTERVENTION: The patient was recommended for inpatient admission with expedited surgical management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy. On laparoscopic entry, the pregnancy was not well-visualized because it did not deform the uterine serosa. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We present a surgical approach to suspected interstitial ectopic pregnancy that is not well-visualized at the time of laparoscopy. RESULTS: The following principles are explored: the use of multiple minimally invasive modalities (laparoscopy and hysteroscopy) to perform a thorough evaluation of the pregnancy location; incorporation of intraoperative ultrasound; temporary vessel ligation and injection of intramyometrial vasopressin; complete enucleation of the products of conception; and closure of the myometrial defect. CONCLUSION: We emphasize the benefits of a multidisciplinary approach for the localization and resection of interstitial ectopic pregnancy. This patient was discharged home in good condition with no complications.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Gravidez Intersticial , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Adulto , Gravidez Intersticial/diagnóstico por imagem , Gravidez Intersticial/cirurgia , Histeroscopia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Ultrassonografia
5.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 227(2): 311.e1-311.e7, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35490792

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The lifetime risk of ovarian cancer is 1.9% among women with endometriosis compared with 1.3% among the general population. When an asymptomatic endometrioma is incidentally discovered on imaging, gynecologists must weigh the procedural complications and the potential for subsequent surgical menopause against future ovarian pathology or cancer. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine if performing unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is a more cost-effective strategy for the prevention of death than surveillance for asymptomatic endometriomas. STUDY DESIGN: We created a cost-effectiveness model using TreeAge Pro (TreeAge Software Inc; Williamstown, MA) with a lifetime horizon. Our hypothetical cohort included premenopausal patients with 2 ovaries who did not desire fertility. Those diagnosed with asymptomatic endometrioma underwent either unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or surveillance (ultrasound 6-12 weeks after diagnosis, then annually). Our primary effectiveness outcome was mortality, including death from ovarian cancer or surgery and all-cause mortality related to surgical menopause (± hormone replacement therapy) if the contralateral ovary is removed. We modeled the probabilities of surgical complications, occult malignancy, development of contralateral adnexal pathology, surgical menopause, use of hormone replacement therapy, and development of ovarian cancer. The costs included surgical procedures, complications, ultrasound surveillance, hormone therapy, and treatment of ovarian cancer, with information gathered from Medicare reimbursement data and published literature. Cost-effectiveness was determined using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of Δ costs / Δ deaths with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $11.6 million as the value of a statistical life. Multiple 1-way sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate model robustness. RESULTS: Our model demonstrated that unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is associated with improved outcomes compared with surveillance, with fewer deaths (0.28% vs 1.50%) and fewer cases of ovarian cancer (0.42% vs 2.96%). However, it costs more than sonographic surveillance at $6403.43 vs $5381.39 per case of incidental endometrioma. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio showed that unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy costs $83,773.77 per death prevented and $40,237.80 per case of ovarian cancer prevented. As both values were well below the willingness-to-pay threshold, unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is cost-effective and is the preferred strategy. If unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were chosen over surveillance for premenopausal patients with incidental endometriomas, 1 diagnosis of ovarian cancer would be prevented in every 40 patients and 1 death averted in every 82 patients. We performed 1-way sensitivity analyses for all input variables and determined that there were no reasonable inputs that would alter our conclusions. CONCLUSION: Unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is cost-effective and is the preferred strategy compared with surveillance for the management of incidental endometrioma in a premenopausal patient not desiring fertility. It incurs fewer deaths and fewer cases of ovarian cancer with costs below the national willingness-to-pay thresholds.


Assuntos
Endometriose , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Idoso , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário , Análise Custo-Benefício , Endometriose/patologia , Endometriose/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Medicare , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Salpingo-Ooforectomia/métodos , Estados Unidos
6.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 29(2): 274-283.e1, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34438045

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of perioperative coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in women undergoing benign gynecologic surgery and to evaluate perioperative complication rates in patients with active, previous, or no previous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. DESIGN: A multicenter prospective cohort study. SETTING: Ten institutions in the United States. PATIENTS: Patients aged >18 years who underwent benign gynecologic surgery from July 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, were included. All patients were followed up from the time of surgery to 10 weeks postoperatively. Those with intrauterine pregnancy or known gynecologic malignancy were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Benign gynecologic surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the incidence of perioperative COVID-19 infections, which was stratified as (1) previous COVID-19 infection, (2) preoperative COVID-19 infection, and (3) postoperative COVID-19 infection. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and mortality after surgery and predictors for postoperative COVID-19 infection. If surgery was delayed because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the reason for postponement and any subsequent adverse event was recorded. Of 3423 patients included for final analysis, 189 (5.5%) postponed their gynecologic surgery during the pandemic. Forty-three patients (1.3% of total cases) had a history of COVID-19. The majority (182, 96.3%) had no sequelae attributed to surgical postponement. After hospital discharge to 10 weeks postoperatively, 39 patients (1.1%) became infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The mean duration of time between hospital discharge and the follow-up positive COVID-19 test was 22.1 ± 12.3 days (range, 4-50 days). Eleven (31.4% of postoperative COVID-19 infections, 0.3% of total cases) of the newly diagnosed COVID-19 infections occurred within 14 days of hospital discharge. On multivariable logistic regression, living in the Southwest (adjusted odds ratio, 6.8) and single-unit increase in age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (adjusted odds ratio, 1.2) increased the odds of postoperative COVID-19 infection. Perioperative complications were not significantly higher in patients with a history of positive COVID-19 than those without a history of COVID-19, although the mean duration of time between previous COVID-19 diagnosis and surgery was 97 days (14 weeks). CONCLUSION: In this large multicenter prospective cohort study of benign gynecologic surgeries, only 1.1% of patients developed a postoperative COVID-19 infection, with 0.3% of infection in the immediate 14 days after surgery. The incidence of postoperative complications was not different in those with and without previous COVID-19 infections.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Adolescente , Teste para COVID-19 , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 29(1): 119-127, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34265441

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness of endometrial sampling for preoperative detection of uterine leiomyosarcoma in women undergoing hysterectomy, identify factors associated with missed diagnosis, and compare the outcomes of patients who had a preoperative diagnosis with those of patients who had a missed diagnosis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using linked data from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System and New York State Cancer Registry from 2003 to 2015. SETTING: Inpatient and outpatient encounters at civilian hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers in New York State. PATIENTS: Women with uterine leiomyosarcoma who underwent a hysterectomy and a preoperative endometrial sampling within 90 days before the hysterectomy. INTERVENTIONS: Endometrial sampling. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 79 patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma met the sample eligibility criteria. Of these patients, 46 (58.2%) were diagnosed preoperatively, and 33 (41.8%) were diagnosed postoperatively. Patients in the 2 groups did not differ significantly in age, race/ethnicity, bleeding symptoms, or comorbidities assessed. In multivariable regression analysis, women who had endometrial sampling performed with hysteroscopy (compared with women who had endeometrial sampling performed without hysteroscopy) had a higher likelihood of preoperative diagnosis (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 3.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-6.42). Patients with localized stage (vs distant stage) or tumor size >11 cm (vs <8 cm) were less likely to be diagnosed preoperatively (aRR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28-0.89, and aRR 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30-0.99, respectively). Supracervical hysterectomy was not performed in any of the patients whose leiomyosarcoma was diagnosed preoperatively compared with 21.2% of the patients who were diagnosed postoperatively (p = .002). CONCLUSION: Endometrial sampling detected leiomyosarcoma preoperatively in 58.2% of the patients. The use of hysteroscopy with endometrial sampling improved preoperative detection of leiomyosarcoma by threefold. Patients with a missed diagnosis had a higher risk of undergoing suboptimal surgical management at the time of their index surgery.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio , Leiomiossarcoma , Neoplasias Uterinas , Neoplasias do Endométrio/cirurgia , Endométrio , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia , Leiomiossarcoma/diagnóstico , Leiomiossarcoma/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia
8.
Fertil Steril ; 117(2): 444-453, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34802687

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perioperative outcomes of premenopausal women undergoing cystectomy or oophorectomy for ovarian endometriomas (OMAs) and other benign neoplasms. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Clinical database containing information from 580 US hospitals. PATIENT(S): Women 18 to 50 years old who underwent ovarian cystectomy or oophorectomy for benign indications between 2010 and 2020. INTERVENTION(S): We compared procedure route, length of hospital stay, and complication rates by surgical indication (OMA vs. other benign neoplasms) and surgical procedure (cystectomy vs. oophorectomy). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Thirty-day perioperative adverse events following adnexal surgery, including conversion to laparotomy, blood transfusion, ileus, urinary tract injury, bowel injury, readmission, and death. RESULT(S): We identified 120,208 ovarian cystectomies (28,182 OMAs and 92,026 other indications) and 53,476 oophorectomies (8,622 OMAs and 44,854 other indications). During cystectomy, patients with OMAs more commonly experienced conversion to laparotomy (5.1% vs. 3.1%) and readmission (8.5% vs. 7.1%). For oophorectomies, patients with OMAs less frequently had minimally invasive surgery (55.8% vs. 64.8%) or outpatient procedures (33.8% vs. 41.8%). Urinary tract and bowel injuries were rare. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that the presence of OMA predicted composite complications during cystectomy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.28) but not during oophorectomy (aOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.99-1.12). Patients with OMAs had 1.37 times the odds of a composite complication during oophorectomy than during cystectomy (95% CI 1.28-1.47). CONCLUSION(S): Patients undergoing ovarian cystectomy for OMAs had higher rates of perioperative adverse events than patients undergoing ovarian cystectomy for other benign neoplasms. Laparotomies were performed more often during oophorectomies for OMAs than for other benign indications.


Assuntos
Cistectomia , Endometriose/cirurgia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Ovariectomia , Transfusão de Sangue , Cistectomia/efeitos adversos , Cistectomia/mortalidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Endometriose/mortalidade , Endometriose/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Ovariectomia/efeitos adversos , Ovariectomia/mortalidade , Readmissão do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Pré-Menopausa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
11.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 28(3): 710-720, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33348012

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Vaginal cuff dehiscence, a severe and potentially detrimental complication, has significantly increased after the introduction of endoscopic hysterectomy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature was to identify the incidence of, and possible strategies to prevent, this complication after total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total robotic hysterectomy. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were systematically queried to identify all articles reporting either laparoscopic or robot-assisted hysterectomies for benign indications in which vaginal dehiscence was reported as an outcome. Reference lists of the identified studies were manually searched. Only papers written in English were considered. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: The Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome framework for the review included (1) population of interest: women who underwent conventional and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy; (2) interventions: possible methods to prevent vaginal dehiscence; (3) comparison: experimental strategies vs standard treatment or alternative strategy for each item of intervention; and (4) outcome: rate of vaginal dehiscence. Series of subtotal hysterectomies and radical hysterectomies in addition to reports that combined both benign and malignant cases were excluded. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan version 5.4.1 (Cochrane Training, London, United Kingdom). Two independent reviewers identified all reports comparing 2 or more possible strategies to prevent vaginal dehiscence. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: A total of 460 articles were identified. Of these, 20 (6 randomized, 2 prospective, and 12 retrospective) studies were included in this review for a total of 19 392 patients. The incidence of vaginal dehiscence after total laparoscopic hysterectomy ranged between 0.64% and 1.35%. Robotic hysterectomy was associated with a risk of vaginal dehiscence of approximately 1.64%. No study compared early vs delayed resumption of coital activity nor analyzed the role of training in laparoscopic suturing. No study specifically assessed the impact of electrosurgery on the risk of vaginal dehiscence in endoscopic hysterectomies for benign indications. Double-layer and reinforced sutures did not decrease the risk of dehiscence. Barbed sutures reduced the risk of separation compared with nonbarbed closure (0.4% [4/1108] vs 2% [22/1097]; odds ratio [OR] 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.57). However, these data came mainly from retrospective series. Excluding studies on the use of self-anchoring sutures during robotic hysterectomy, there was no significant difference in the risk of dehiscence between barbed and nonbarbed sutures (0.5% [4/890] vs 1.4% [181/776]; OR 0.38; 95% CI, 0.13-1.10). Transvaginal suture of the vault at the end of an endoscopic hysterectomy seemed to increase the risk of dehiscence when compared with laparoscopic closure (2.3% [23/1002] vs 1.16% [11/944]; OR 1.97; 95% CI, 1.00-3.88). CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of high-quality papers evaluating vaginal dehiscence and possible prevention strategies in the current literature. Only 2 effective strategies have been identified in reducing the risk for this complication: the use of barbed sutures and the adoption of a laparoscopic approach to close the vaginal cuff. When restricting the analysis only to laparoscopic cases, the use of barbed sutures does not protect against vaginal cuff separation.


Assuntos
Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/prevenção & controle , Técnicas de Sutura/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Vaginais/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Incidência , Laparoscopia/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/epidemiologia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Doenças Vaginais/epidemiologia , Doenças Vaginais/etiologia
12.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 10(10)2020 Sep 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33007875

RESUMO

We aim to describe the diagnosis and surgical management of urinary tract endometriosis (UTE). We detail current diagnostic tools, including advanced transvaginal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and surgical diagnostic tools such as cystourethroscopy. While discussing surgical treatment options, we emphasize the importance of an interdisciplinary team for complex cases that involve the urinary tract. While bladder deep endometriosis (DE) is more straightforward in its surgical treatment, ureteral DE requires a high level of surgical skill. Specialists should be aware of the important entity of UTE, due to the serious health implications for women. When UTE exists, it is important to work within an interdisciplinary radiological and surgical team.

14.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 223(5): 762-763, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32693094

RESUMO

Vaginal hysterectomy rates in the United States are decreasing, despite it being the recommended hysterectomy route for benign hysterectomy by multiple societies. Visualization issues are a known barrier to a medical student learning in the operating room, and it is likely that this also extends to resident training. In addition, vaginal surgery can be taxing on both the surgeons and assistants, with high rates of musculoskeletal work disorders reported in vaginal surgeons. The use of a camera is integral to endoscopic surgery, and table-mounted retractor systems have been used for decades in open surgery. We bring these 2 features into vaginal surgery, that is, using a table-mounted camera system and a table-mounted vaginal retractor. When used together as demonstrated in this video, these tools can improve visualization and may improve ergonomics for the entire surgical team, including learners, during vaginal surgery.


Assuntos
Ergonomia , Histerectomia Vaginal/instrumentação , Equipamentos Cirúrgicos , Terminais de Computador , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/instrumentação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Humanos , Histerectomia Vaginal/métodos , Vagina/cirurgia
15.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 27(4): 883-891, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31238150

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To validate the algorithm for selective bowel surgery based on preoperative imaging by comparing the perioperative outcomes of patients who undergo each type of bowel surgery for deep bowel disease, and secondarily to evaluate the incidence, factors, and subsequent outcomes when the actual procedure performed deviated from the preoperative surgical plan. DESIGN: Retrospective study comparing 3 surgical interventions in an intention-to-treat analysis. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Women with significant pain (visual analog scale [VAS] >7) who were diagnosed with bowel endometriosis from preoperative imaging and underwent laparoscopic surgery for bowel endometriosis at a large referral center between 2014 and 2017. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic shaving, disc resection, or full-segment resection and reanastomosis of bowel endometriosis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 172 patients (mean age, 36.6 ± 5.2 years) underwent bowel surgery for endometriosis (n = 30 shaving, 71 disc, and 71 segmental resection). Total operative time was similar in the 3 group, but the mean length of hospital stay was longer in the segmental group (5.3 ± 1.0 days) compared with the disc group (4.6 ± 0.9 days) and the shaving group (3.8 ± 1.5 days) (p = .001). The surgical procedure was performed as planned according to the clinical algorithm in 86.5% of patients. Adherence to the proposed clinical algorithm resulted in a low incidence of overall complications (8.7% of total complications, 4.6% of minor complications, and 3.5% of major complications). The incidence of minor complications was higher in the segmental group (9.9%) compared with the discoid group (1.4%) and the shaving group (0%) (p = .0236), whereas the incidence of major complications were similar across the 3 groups (3.3%, 2.8%, and 4.2%, respectively; p = .899). There was a significantly higher frequency of pseudomembranous colitis in the segmental resection group (7 patients; 9.9%) compared with the discoid group (n = 1; 1.4%) and shaving group (0%) (p = .04). Owing to discrepancies between preoperative imaging and intraoperative findings after dissection and mobilization, deviation from the planned procedure occurred in a total of 25 of 172 cases (14.5%), with a less extensive procedure actually performed in 21 of 25 (84%) of the deviated cases. One of the 4 cases (25%) that involved a more extensive procedure resulted in a major complication of rectovaginal fistula. CONCLUSION: Selective bowel resection algorithm provides a systematic approach to the surgical management of patients with bowel endometriosis. Adherence to the surgical plan according to the preoperative imaging and criteria outlined in the algorithm can be accomplished in the majority of patients; however, the surgical team should be aware that upstaging or downstaging may be required, depending on the intraoperative findings. When feasible, the team should opt for a less extensive procedure to avoid complications associated with more radical surgery.


Assuntos
Endometriose , Laparoscopia , Doenças Retais , Adulto , Algoritmos , Endometriose/complicações , Endometriose/diagnóstico por imagem , Endometriose/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Doenças Retais/complicações , Doenças Retais/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Retais/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 27(6): 1316-1323, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31669552

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate bowel function (changes in stool caliber, sensation of incomplete evacuation, stooling frequency, and rectal bleeding) and urinary function (dysuria and retention) after segmental resection in patients with bowel endometriosis. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 413 (mean age = 33.6 ± 5.1 years) of reproductive aged women, with bowel endometriosis that underwent segmental bowel resection of the rectosigmoid from 2005 to 2018, without history of prior bowel surgery, without existing or history of malignancy. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic segmental bowel resection performed by the same team and with the same technique. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data collected from the patients' records included length of resected segment, distance of the lesion from the anal verge, and complications. Information on intestinal and urinary function was obtained from a questionnaire applied before the surgery and at 2, 6, and 12 months after the surgery. There was a significant increase in the incidence of stool thinning and rectal bleeding 2 months after surgical procedure; these symptoms decreased significantly over time. The incidence of urinary symptoms decreased significantly over time after surgery. The length of the bowel segment resected was not associated with the postoperative symptoms, but the rectosigmoid lesion was significantly closer to the anal verge in patients with rectal bleeding and urinary symptoms. There was no association between the length of intestinal segment resected and the frequency of stooling. At 6 months, patients who had a decreased frequency of stooling underwent a resection closer to the anal verge (9.7 cm) in comparison with the ones with unchanged or increase frequency of stooling (10.1 cm and 10.7 cm, respectively; p <.05). CONCLUSION: Patient complaints on bowel and urinary alterations after segmental resection were transient with significant improvement over time up to 12 months. Bowel and urinary symptoms were not associated with the size of the bowel segment resected, whereas rectal bleeding at 2 months after surgery was significantly associated with the distance from anal verge. Segmental resection was also associated with a great improvement in constipation at 12 months postoperative.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Endometriose/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/reabilitação , Doenças Retais/cirurgia , Doenças do Colo Sigmoide/cirurgia , Adulto , Colo/cirurgia , Colo Sigmoide/cirurgia , Constipação Intestinal/epidemiologia , Constipação Intestinal/etiologia , Constipação Intestinal/reabilitação , Defecação/fisiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Endometriose/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/reabilitação , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/reabilitação , Doenças Retais/epidemiologia , Reto/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças do Colo Sigmoide/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo
18.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 27(2): 332-343, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31377454

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature regarding the efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in reducing adenomyotic lesions, patients' pain and bleeding symptoms, and the impact on patients' quality of life. DATA SOURCE: A search was performed through PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane databases. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: All available studies published in the English language in the last 10 years that evaluated the effects of HIFU for adenomyosis. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: A systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A meta-analysis was performed on data from homogeneous studies. Pooled results from the meta-analysis showed that after HIFU treatment for adenomyosis, a large effect was observed in reducing the uterine volume at 12 months (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.85), a significant reduction in dysmenorrhea at 3 months (SMD = 1.83) and 12 months (SMD = 2.37), and a significant improvement in quality of life at 6 months (SMD = 3.0) and 12 months (SMD = 2.75). Adverse reactions after HIFU were reported in 55.9% of patients. CONCLUSION: This review suggests a potential benefit for HIFU in the treatment of adenomyosis-related symptoms; however, findings of the meta-analysis were based on fewer, nonuniform studies, which did not equally account for each specific symptom/parameter across the board. Results showed there appears to be a potential of HIFU in the treatment of adenomyosis-related symptoms. To date, there are no comparative and randomized clinical trials comparing the HIFU technique with other conservative treatment options. As yet, there are insufficient data regarding fertility and pregnancy outcomes.


Assuntos
Adenomiose/terapia , Ablação por Ultrassom Focalizado de Alta Intensidade/métodos , Adenomiose/epidemiologia , Adenomiose/patologia , Adulto , Dismenorreia/epidemiologia , Dismenorreia/terapia , Feminino , Fertilidade/fisiologia , Ablação por Ultrassom Focalizado de Alta Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 27(6): 1405-1413, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31812614

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the feasibility of opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy (OBS) at the time of vaginal hysterectomy (VH) for benign disease in patients with and without relative contraindications (RCs) to the vaginal approach and to evaluate the factors that contribute to the inability to perform OBS. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: Women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications between November 2014 and October 2017 who were consented for either VH with or without removal of tube(s) and/or bilateral salpingectomy. INTERVENTIONS: RCs to the vaginal approach are defined as lack of prolapse (cervix high, cervix not visualized, cervix tucked underneath pubis, or minimal descent), enlarged uterus (≥250 g or a size of a ≥12-week uterus), nulliparity, obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2), previous cesarean section (CS), known adhesions, and known adnexal pathologic condition. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 258 patients underwent VH and attempted to undergo OBS within the study period; of these, 112 patients (43.4%) had no RC, and 146 patients (56.6%) had ≥1 RCs. Overall, successful salpingectomy was performed in 86.8% of patients. There was no significant difference in the rate of success in patients without or with ≥1 RCs (84.9% vs 89%, p = .15). Salpingectomy was unsuccessful in 13.2% of patients (n = 34). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, the odds of unsuccessful OBS were 3.83 times higher in patients without prolapse (confidence interval [CI], 0.99-14.76; p = .051), 2.71 times higher in patients with obesity (CI, 1.23-5.94; p = .013), and 3.07 times higher in patients with previous CS (CI, 1.17-8.08; p = .023) as compared to patients without any relative contraindications. An enlarged uterus was associated with successful salpingectomy (odds ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08-0.94; p = .039) compared with a normal-sized uterus. When excluding enlarged uterus, patients with 2 to 3 RCs had 11.24 and 6.8 higher odds of an unsuccessful OBS than patients with no (CI, 3.73-33.87; p <.001) and 1 RC (CI, 2.36-19.63; p <.001), respectively. There were no differences in postoperative stay or rates of readmission among patients with or without successful salpingectomy at the time of VH. CONCLUSION: OBS is associated with a high overall rate of success in patients with and without traditional RCs to VH. Lack of prolapse, obesity, and previous CS were associated with failed attempt at salpingectomy. Patients with ≥2 RCs to VH should be counseled about the high likelihood of failed salpingectomy.


Assuntos
Contraindicações de Procedimentos , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Histerectomia Vaginal/efeitos adversos , Salpingectomia/métodos , Adulto , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/métodos , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Salpingectomia/efeitos adversos , Salpingectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 26(7): 1234-1252.e1, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31039407

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma(s) is associated with significant morbidity including blood loss. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to identify nonhormonal interventions, perioperative surgical interventions, and devices to minimize blood loss at the time of hysterectomy for leiomyoma. DATA SOURCES: Librarian-led search of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane databases from 1946 to 2018 with hand-guided updates. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Included studies reported on keywords of hysterectomy, leiomyoma, and operative blood loss/postoperative hemorrhage/uterine bleeding/metrorrhagia/hematoma. The review excluded a comparison of route of hysterectomy, morcellation, vaginal cuff closure, hormonal medications, vessel sealing devices for vaginal hysterectomy, and case series with <10 patients. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Surgical blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) drop, hemorrhage, transfusion, and major and minor complications were analyzed and aggregated in meta-analyses for comparable studies in each category. A total of 2016 unique studies were identified, 33 of which met the inclusion criteria, and 22 were used for quantitative synthesis. The perioperative use of misoprostol in abdominal hysterectomy (AH) was associated with a lower postoperative Hb drop (0.59 g/dL; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.79; p < .01) and blood loss (-96.43 mL; 95% CI, -153.52 to -39.34; p < .01) compared with placebo. Securing the uterine vessels at their origin in laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) was associated with decreased intraoperative blood loss (-69.07 mL; 95% CI, -135.20 to -2.95; p = .04) but no significant change in postoperative Hb (0.24 g/dL; 95% CI, -0.31 to 0.78; p = .39) compared with securing them by the uterine isthmus. Uterine artery ligation in LH before dissecting the ovarian/utero-ovarian vessels was associated with lower surgical blood loss compared with standard ligation (-27.72 mL; 95% CI, -35.07 to -20.38; p < .01). The postoperative Hb drop was not significantly different with a bipolar electrosurgical device versus suturing in AH (0.26 g/dL; 95% CI, -0.19 to 0.71; p = .26). There was no significant difference between an electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealer (EBVS) and conventional bipolar electrosurgical devices in the Hb drop (0.02 g/dL; 95% CI, -0.15 to 0.20; p = .79) or blood loss (-50.88 mL; 95% CI, -106.44 to 4.68; p = .07) in LH. Blood loss in LH was not decreased with the LigaSure (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) impedance monitoring EBVS compared with competing EBVS systems monitoring impedance or temperature (2.00 mL; 95% CI, -8.09 to 12.09; p = .70). No significant differences in hemorrhage, transfusion, or major complications were noted for all interventions. CONCLUSION: Perioperative misoprostol in AH led to a reduction in surgical blood loss and postoperative Hb drop (moderate level of evidence by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines) although the clinical benefit is likely limited. Remaining interventions, although promising, had at best low-quality evidence to support their use at this time. Larger and rigorously designed randomized trials are needed to establish the optimal set of perioperative interventions for use in hysterectomy for leiomyomas.


Assuntos
Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Histerectomia , Leiomioma/cirurgia , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA